BREAKING UPDATE: Police have announced that five newly discovered pieces of evidence could prove decisive in finally breaking the Nancy Guthrie case wide open.
Cold case merchandise
Five pieces of evidence. No arrests. No named suspects.
As the disappearance of Nancy Guthrie enters its third week, investigators say the case remains wide open — but the trail of clues is growing more complex, and more unsettling, by the day.
Private investigator services
The 84-year-old mother of Savannah Guthrie vanished from her Tucson home in the Catalina Foothills during the early hours of February 1. From the outset, authorities have treated the property as a crime scene, with Federal Bureau of Investigation now offering a $100,000 reward for information leading to answers.
Cold case merchandise
Here are the five key pieces of evidence investigators are focusing on so far.
1. The Timeline That Changed Everything
According to Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos, Nancy Guthrie ate dinner with relatives on January 31 and was dropped home at 9:48 p.m. Her garage door closed two minutes later.
At 1:47 a.m., her Nest doorbell camera went offline.
At 2:28 a.m., her pacemaker lost connection with her smartphone.
By midday on February 1, she was officially reported missing.
Private investigator services
Authorities believe she was removed from her home against her will during this window.
2. The Masked Figure on Video
Recovered footage from Guthrie’s Nest camera shows a masked man at her door, carrying a stuffed backpack and what appears to be a holstered firearm. Cold case merchandiseFBI analysts estimate the individual stands between 5ft 9in and 5ft 10in, with a medium build. The backpack has been identified as a black Ozark Trail model, sold at Walmart for around $11. The holster is believed to be a Strategy brand hip holster, also commonly sold at Walmart.
Moments before the footage cuts out, the suspect appears to block the camera with plant material. When police arrived later, the camera itself was missing.
3. The DNA Discovery
Investigators recovered DNA from an unknown individual inside the home — not matching Guthrie, family members, or household workers.
Sixteen gloves were later found within a two-mile radius of the property. One glove, believed to match the one seen in the surveillance video, contained an unknown male DNA profile. Authorities planned to compare it against federal databases, though results have not been publicly confirmed.
4. Blood at the Front Door
A trail of blood droplets on the front steps has been confirmed as Nancy Guthrie’s.
Sheriff Nanos has declined to say whether the blood was present before or after she was taken and has refused to discuss additional forensic findings from inside the home, citing the ongoing investigation.5. The Pacemaker Search — And Digital Forensics
Guthrie’s pacemaker provided a crucial timestamp when it disconnected from her phone. Hoping it could offer more, authorities deployed advanced Bluetooth signal-scanning equipment by air — but the search yielded no results.
Behind the scenes, investigators are also analyzing roadside cameras, home surveillance footage, cell-tower data, and other digital records. Thousands of tips have been submitted, and residents within a two-mile radius have been asked to provide any video recorded between January 1 and February 2.
An undisclosed tip recently led to a late-night search of a nearby home and vehicle, along with the temporary detention of three people. None were charged, and no suspects have been named.
A Case Still Without Answers
Despite intense scrutiny, national attention, and cutting-edge forensic tools, Nancy Guthrie’s fate remains unknown. Authorities insist they are following every lead — both public and private — and say even the smallest detail could break the case open.
Cold case merchandiseAnyone with information is urged to contact the FBI at 1-800-CALL-FBI.
Stanton Defeats Democratic Socialist Challenger In Arizona Primary
One of the Democratic Party’s most closely watched primary battles has ended with a decisive victory for an incumbent congressman, despite an aggressive challenge from the party’s progressive wing.
The race had drawn national attention as another test of whether candidates running on an anti-Israel platform could unseat more established Democrats.
Rep. Greg Stanton easily defeated democratic socialist challenger Kai Newkirk in Arizona’s Democratic primary Tuesday, securing the nomination for another term in Congress with a commanding margin.
With nearly all votes counted, Stanton received about 68.1% of the vote compared with Newkirk’s 31.9%, according to multiple media outlets.
The victory sends Stanton, a former Phoenix mayor first elected to Congress in 2018, into November’s general election, where he is expected to face Republican Zuhdi Jasser.
Following the race, Stanton described the outcome as a choice about the future direction of the Democratic Party.
“This campaign presented voters with a real choice about how Democrats should lead,” Stanton said in a statement posted to his campaign page.
“Tonight, the voters chose proven leadership that fights back, delivers real results, and brings our party together.”
Throughout the campaign, Newkirk attempted to make U.S. support for Israel the defining issue in the race.
He repeatedly criticized Stanton for receiving support from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, commonly known as AIPAC, and accused the organization of wielding too much influence in American politics.
Newkirk also pointed to a multimillion-dollar public messaging campaign promoting Israel as evidence of what he characterized as outside influence in U.S. elections.
Among his policy positions, Newkirk called for ending U.S. military aid to Israel and imposing an arms embargo on the country.
He also sharply criticized Stanton after the congressman voted against an amendment offered by Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., that would have reduced military assistance to Israel.
“Greg Stanton has taken over $300K from AIPAC,” Newkirk wrote during the campaign.
Stanton defended his vote, arguing that reducing military assistance would weaken America’s ability to counter threats from Iran while also acknowledging that changes in Israeli leadership and policy would be necessary as the current U.S.-Israel security agreement approaches its 2028 expiration.
Although Stanton has supported continued military assistance to Israel, he has also publicly criticized Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on multiple occasions.
Newkirk received endorsements from several progressive organizations, including Our Revolution, Progressive Democrats of America and Track AIPAC.
He was also endorsed by The Young Turks founder Cenk Uygur.
However, his campaign faced setbacks in its closing weeks.
Earlier this month, the Young Democrats of Arizona withdrew their endorsement, saying they had become aware of “concerning patterns of behavior.”
The organization did not publicly provide additional details.
Newkirk denied any wrongdoing and argued the move was part of a political smear campaign.
Despite his sharp criticism of Israel’s military campaign in Gaza, Newkirk also condemned antisemitism and spoke out after two Israeli Embassy employees were killed outside the Capital Jewish Museum in Washington last year.
“I stand always with my beloved Jewish siblings against the scourge of antisemitism just as I will never stop in the nonviolent struggle to end the genocide in Gaza, release all hostages, and open the way to just, lasting peace,” he said at the time.
The Arizona contest was closely watched because it reflected broader debates inside the Democratic Party over Israel, foreign policy and the growing influence of democratic socialist candidates.
While several progressive candidates have won Democratic primaries around the country in recent years, Stanton’s decisive victory suggests that message did not resonate with enough Democratic primary voters in Arizona’s 4th Congressional District, Trending Politics reported.
With the primary now decided, Stanton will turn his attention to the general election as Democrats seek to defend the seat in November, while Republicans hope to capitalize on continued ideological divisions within the Democratic Party.
